Your buyers ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overview for a recommendation, then act on the handful of names that come back. Traditional SEO gets you ranked. AI SEO gets you cited. We measure exactly where you stand across all five AI engines, then engineer the content, sources, and signals that put you in the answer.
AI engines don’t hand back ten links anymore. They read the web, synthesize one answer, and cite a few sources. AI SEO — also called Generative Engine Optimization, or GEO — is the practice of becoming one of those cited sources.
It shares a technical foundation with SEO and diverges on everything above it. You still need both. Only one of them is where your buyers now start.
Most engagements run all six together — they’re designed to. You can scope a single one if that’s where the gap is. Each links to how we run it.
We pull the 80–200 prompts your buyers actually type across five engines, then map where you're cited, where a competitor is, and where the answer is still up for grabs.
How we run it →Schema, llms.txt, parser-friendly markup, and the most-cited URLs on your site — fixed so AI engines can read, trust, and quote you. The layer most programs skip.
How we run it →Your /vs and /alternatives pages, written and ranked, plus the third-party comparison threads where the shortlist actually gets settled.
How we run it →AI cites Reddit, communities, and editorial more than your own domain. We earn placements in the threads and publications the engines already pull from.
How we run it →Long-tail, factual answers mined from your sales calls and support tickets — the question-and-answer pairs LLMs decompose complex prompts into.
How we run it →One weekly dashboard: citation share by prompt, branded-search lift, and demo or signup requests that self-report an AI source. We measure to revenue.
How we run it →The reason AI SEO usually disappoints is structural: the agency shipping the content has no instrument to see whether AI engines picked it up. We built one. Software plus done-for-you, not a dashboard you’re left to operate or a deck with no data behind it.
Geology tracks your citation share across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews every week. Every fix is briefed from what the data shows, and every result is checked against it. You’re never paying for content and hoping.
No junior hand-off, no four-vendor sprawl. One senior team owns measurement and execution on a weekly cadence, against one dashboard. GEO, technical SEO, content, and off-site citations run as a single program instead of four disconnected retainers.
Not a keyword-tool dump. The 80–200 prompts your buyers type into ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews, segmented by funnel stage and persona, scored by where you stand today.
Schema, llms.txt, parser-friendly markup, and the specific URLs the engines already cite. Most brands have a strong product and a citation-unfriendly site. This layer unlocks everything above it.
Your /vs, /alternatives, and use-case pages, written and ranked — plus the Reddit and review-site threads where the shortlist actually gets decided.
AI trusts sources more than self-published claims. We earn placements in the communities, threads, and editorial the engines pull from, without sounding like a vendor in someone else's community.
Citation share by prompt, branded-search lift, and AI-attributed demo or signup requests. We report to the revenue line, not the rankings page.
Run a Live Audit. We pull your brand against competitors on the buyer prompts that matter across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews, and send the full report to your inbox.
